<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Blog &#187; programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitlords.com/wp/category/programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitlords.com/wp</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Defining Useful Coding Practices?</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/0OnKsfI9YxA/Defining-Useful-Coding-Practices</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/0OnKsfI9YxA/Defining-Useful-Coding-Practices#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clever solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disappointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markmcb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://c8a4b81ab495ed0b0c62a51871855816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[markmcb writes "A NASA engineer recently wrote about his disappointment that despite having well-documented coding practices, 'clever' solutions still made the code he has to maintain hard to follow. This got me thinking about the overhead spent at my own company regarding our code. We too have best practices that are documented, but most seem to focus on the basics, e.g., comments, modularity, etc. While those things are good, they don't directly ensure that quality, maintainable code is written. As the author points out, an elegant one-liner coupled with a comment from a few revisions ago makes for a good headache. I'm curious what experience others have had with this, and if you've seen manageable practices that ultimately offer a lot of value to the next programmer down the line who will have to maintain the code."<p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/12/06/1456251/Defining-Useful-Coding-Practices?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/12/06/1456251"></a></p><p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/12/06/1456251/Defining-Useful-Coding-Practices?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m3fejons2m_Ms_B9MTOmHRTAI2E/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m3fejons2m_Ms_B9MTOmHRTAI2E/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m3fejons2m_Ms_B9MTOmHRTAI2E/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m3fejons2m_Ms_B9MTOmHRTAI2E/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/0OnKsfI9YxA" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/0OnKsfI9YxA/Defining-Useful-Coding-Practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Linux Documentation Lacking?</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/FFrrEreI_a0/Is-Linux-Documentation-Lacking</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/FFrrEreI_a0/Is-Linux-Documentation-Lacking#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CmdrTaco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carla Schroeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eldavojohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schroeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://cb9ce63e65f81618ed5d6f2fd969d601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eldavojohn writes "A number of blog posts are surfacing that are calling out the helpful open source community on their documentation. No, not the documentation for the highly skilled technical people, but the documentation from beginner to apprentice. A two-part series by Carla Schroeder lists bad documentation as 'Linux Bug #1' and advises users to use Google as the documentation. We've discussed before some of open source's documentation being out of date. Is it really as bad as these blogs paint it? Has it come down to using Google before a man page?"<p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/12/03/1449211/Is-Linux-Documentation-Lacking?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/12/03/1449211"></a></p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/12/03/1449211/Is-Linux-Documentation-Lacking?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/wDvyg731sOU_pvC6zIKmYdOStM4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/wDvyg731sOU_pvC6zIKmYdOStM4/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/wDvyg731sOU_pvC6zIKmYdOStM4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/wDvyg731sOU_pvC6zIKmYdOStM4/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/FFrrEreI_a0" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/FFrrEreI_a0/Is-Linux-Documentation-Lacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying To Bust JavaScript Out of the Browser</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/w8pJ2w73_6g/Trying-To-Bust-JavaScript-Out-of-the-Browser</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/w8pJ2w73_6g/Trying-To-Bust-JavaScript-Out-of-the-Browser#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CommonJS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime against humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecmascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eldavojohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ServerJS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usefulness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://78f11a85749eff493e1c9acf9cf62496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eldavojohn writes "If you think JavaScript is a crime against humanity, you might want to skip this article, because Ars is reporting on efforts to take JavaScript to the next level. With the new ECMAScript 5 draft proposal, the article points out a lot of positive things that have happened in the world of JavaScript. The article does a good job of citing some of the major problems with JavaScript and how a reborn library called CommonJS (formerly ServerJS) is addressing each of those problems. No one can deny JavaScript's usefulness on the front end of the web, but if you're a developer do you support the efforts to move it beyond that?"<p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/12/01/1548221/Trying-To-Bust-JavaScript-Out-of-the-Browser?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/12/01/1548221"></a></p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/12/01/1548221/Trying-To-Bust-JavaScript-Out-of-the-Browser?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-yN_0MKf7GhB9IQpQYbdrvrZBJ8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-yN_0MKf7GhB9IQpQYbdrvrZBJ8/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-yN_0MKf7GhB9IQpQYbdrvrZBJ8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-yN_0MKf7GhB9IQpQYbdrvrZBJ8/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/w8pJ2w73_6g" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/w8pJ2w73_6g/Trying-To-Bust-JavaScript-Out-of-the-Browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumbing Down Programming?</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4po4pgwHjpI/Dumbing-Down-Programming</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4po4pgwHjpI/Dumbing-Down-Programming#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descendant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English-syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypercard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RunRevKev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unveiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZDNet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://fbd346ae626197cadbab6017de04e236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RunRevKev writes "The unveiling of Revolution 4.0 has sparked a debate on ZDNet about whether programming is being dumbed down. The new version of the software uses an English-syntax that requires 90 per cent less code than traditional languages. A descendant of Apple's Hypercard, Rev 4 is set to '...empower people who would never have attempted programming to create successful applications.' ZDNet report that "One might reasonably hope that this product inspires students in the appropriate way and gets them more interested in programming.""<p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/11/26/2016255/Dumbing-Down-Programming?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/11/26/2016255"></a></p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/11/26/2016255/Dumbing-Down-Programming?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0SuGDQFfm5lEjRdJM8kfU_zsVtM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0SuGDQFfm5lEjRdJM8kfU_zsVtM/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0SuGDQFfm5lEjRdJM8kfU_zsVtM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0SuGDQFfm5lEjRdJM8kfU_zsVtM/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/4po4pgwHjpI" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4po4pgwHjpI/Dumbing-Down-Programming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haskell 2010 Announced</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/6lsYfz1ApbQ/Haskell-2010-Announced</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/6lsYfz1ApbQ/Haskell-2010-Announced#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional programming language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paltemalte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Marlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://c3076a132f497fb4f45d216a0293d665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[paltemalte writes "Simon Marlow has posted an announcement of Haskell 2010, a new revision of the Haskell purely functional programming language. Good news for everyone interested in SMP and concurrency programming."<p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/11/24/2120246/Haskell-2010-Announced?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/11/24/2120246"></a></p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/11/24/2120246/Haskell-2010-Announced?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jvUmjRYQUy6CrAgfW7vhX0iCdZg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jvUmjRYQUy6CrAgfW7vhX0iCdZg/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jvUmjRYQUy6CrAgfW7vhX0iCdZg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jvUmjRYQUy6CrAgfW7vhX0iCdZg/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/6lsYfz1ApbQ" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/6lsYfz1ApbQ/Haskell-2010-Announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.397 seconds -->
