<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Blog &#187; inputdev</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitlords.com/wp/category/inputdev/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitlords.com/wp</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Brain-Control Gaming Headset Launching Dec. 21</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/oV4cyuLWCEc/Brain-Control-Gaming-Headset-Launching-Dec-21</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/oV4cyuLWCEc/Brain-Control-Gaming-Headset-Launching-Dec-21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[inputdev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-founder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controlling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlling computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotiv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://92f5f71570d9d8f2b7bbb4b1ab83bd42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader writes "Controlling computers with our minds may sound like science fiction, but one Australian company claims to be able to let you do just that. The Emotiv device has been garnering attention at trade shows and conferences for several years, and now the company says it is set to launch the Emotiv EPOC headset on December 21. PC Authority spoke to co-founder Nam Do about the Emotiv technology and its potential as a mainstream gaming interface." One wonders what kind of adoption they expect with a $299 price tag.<p><a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/09/12/03/0616246/Brain-Control-Gaming-Headset-Launching-Dec-21?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/12/03/0616246"></a></p><p><a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/09/12/03/0616246/Brain-Control-Gaming-Headset-Launching-Dec-21?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/C7zuFGwd8BXKfDUFbxRR77idMiM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/C7zuFGwd8BXKfDUFbxRR77idMiM/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/C7zuFGwd8BXKfDUFbxRR77idMiM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/C7zuFGwd8BXKfDUFbxRR77idMiM/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/oV4cyuLWCEc" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/oV4cyuLWCEc/Brain-Control-Gaming-Headset-Launching-Dec-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typewriters, Computers, and Creating?</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Ufmjpj7EBzM/Typewriters-Computers-and-Creating</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Ufmjpj7EBzM/Typewriters-Computers-and-Creating#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[inputdev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cormac McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[correspondence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ephemeral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generic pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instrument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Stephenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olivetti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olivetti manual typewriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research fellow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saddleupsancho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sante fe institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[something]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typewriter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://a68a172f578e03b191ec6d5b7293c986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[saddleupsancho writes "Today's NY Times reports that Cormac McCarthy is auctioning the 45-year-old Olivetti manual typewriter on which all his novels, screenplays, plays, short stories, and much of his correspondence were written, to benefit the Sante Fe Institute where he is a Research Fellow. What would happen decades from now if, say, Richard Powers or Neal Stephenson attempted to auction their desktops or laptops? Setting aside completely any comparison among the three authors, is there something more intrinsically interesting and valuable, less ephemeral and interchangeable, about a typewriter vs. a computer as an instrument of literary creation? Or is the current generation just as sentimental about their computer-based devices as McCarthy's generation is about his Olivetti? Would you offer as much for McCarthy's input device if it were a generic PC, Mac, or Linux box as you would for his Olivetti?"<p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/12/01/226250/Typewriters-Computers-and-Creating?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/12/01/226250"></a></p><p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/12/01/226250/Typewriters-Computers-and-Creating?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/aLoQuzo_AQqENbd-QSKCfFmPVxE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/aLoQuzo_AQqENbd-QSKCfFmPVxE/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/aLoQuzo_AQqENbd-QSKCfFmPVxE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/aLoQuzo_AQqENbd-QSKCfFmPVxE/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/Ufmjpj7EBzM" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Ufmjpj7EBzM/Typewriters-Computers-and-Creating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giving Touch-Screen Buttons Depth and Height With Pneumatics</title>
		<link>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/-ovbkOMmaYk/Giving-Touch-Screen-Buttons-Depth-and-Height-With-Pneumatics</link>
		<comments>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/-ovbkOMmaYk/Giving-Touch-Screen-Buttons-Depth-and-Height-With-Pneumatics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[inputdev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car navigation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnegie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carnegie mellon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic reconfigurability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mellon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconfigurability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen buttons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactile feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOUCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch screen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.slashdot.org://c8300f646c7ef0ae8c3cfaeb99496ba5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blee37 writes "Researchers at Carnegie Mellon demonstrate 'popping out' touch screen buttons to become physical buttons using pneumatics. The idea is to combine the dynamic reconfigurability of touch screen buttons with the tactile feedback of real buttons. The technology could be applied where tactile feedback is currently lacking, such as in car navigation systems, ATMs, or cell phones."<p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/11/24/1557239/Giving-Touch-Screen-Buttons-Depth-and-Height-With-Pneumatics?from=rss"><img src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&#38;op=image&#38;style=h0&#38;sid=09/11/24/1557239"></a></p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/11/24/1557239/Giving-Touch-Screen-Buttons-Depth-and-Height-With-Pneumatics?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/b0EifJaw2rTE8H0Qi7SZEPrrff4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/b0EifJaw2rTE8H0Qi7SZEPrrff4/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/b0EifJaw2rTE8H0Qi7SZEPrrff4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/b0EifJaw2rTE8H0Qi7SZEPrrff4/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/-ovbkOMmaYk" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/-ovbkOMmaYk/Giving-Touch-Screen-Buttons-Depth-and-Height-With-Pneumatics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.229 seconds -->
